|
1
|
- September 26, 2006
- Greensboro
|
|
2
|
- CMS (Federal) disapproves of the current financing and policy structure
for Medicaid’s ACH/PCS
- Since 1995, when CMS first approved the structure, additional
regulations have been developed
- CMS wants us to treat the adult care home as a person’s home and we
cannot treat the ach resident different from a person living in a
private residence
|
|
3
|
- CMS push for person centered planning, consumer directed care and
individual plans of care
- Need to provide Medicaid recipients the services that meet their medical
needs; no more and no less
- Quality initiatives for Medicaid services to meet the CMS quality
requirements
|
|
4
|
- Numerous state studies that point out need for ACH quality and
performance issues and the need to upgrade provider capacities
|
|
5
|
- CMS supports this initiative to restructure the ACH/PCS program
- Impact of restructuring is broad
- Medicaid policies and processes
- DFS rules and regulatory functions
- Laws and requirements
- Roles and responsibilities
- CMS emphasizes stakeholder involvement and an open process
|
|
6
|
- Stakeholders
- State staff from DMA, DFS, DAAS
- ACH providers
- Home Care Providers
- State Associations
- Consumers and their families
|
|
7
|
- Core Planning Group
- Three Work Groups
- Policy Work Group
- Rate-setting Work Group
- Rules and Legislation Work Group
- Identify changes needed and provide recommendations to DMA
|
|
8
|
- Charge to Work Groups:
- To produce a cohesive draft Medicaid policy for the provision of
personal care services that will address the needs of the adult care
home residents and recipients living in a private residence;
- To craft a single rate-setting methodology;
- To identify the changes needed in rules and legislation; AND
|
|
9
|
|